Sometimes Shark Tank is good for a bit of entrepreneurial strategy. Here is a video of Scott Jordan of Scottevest. This is a company that has gone all in on the idea that people want pockets for their gadgets. I love this stuff and have their vest, jacket, pants etc. What was he doing on …
Annals of Coherent Entrepreneurial Strategy: Clover Food Lab
Last week I was at MIT and had my first experience of Clover Food Lab. No, it isn't some fancy new scientific research institute. Instead, it is a food truck. Except that I didn't visit a food truck but felt that I had. The Clover I visited was, in fact, a cafe/restaurant/I don't know what …
Continue reading "Annals of Coherent Entrepreneurial Strategy: Clover Food Lab"
The Final Box: Architectural Strategy
It is now time to fill in the final box of our recent travel across the Entrepreneurial Strategy canvas. Recall that I argued that there were two key dimensions that could assist entrepreneurs in finding the right business model to match with their idea: (i) they could focus on execution or invest in control and …
Another choice: The Intellectual Property Strategy
Over the past two weeks, I have been outlining broad strategic options for entrepreneurs of which a disruption strategy is just one choice. The concept is that a given entrepreneurial idea can be commercialised in many different ways. The key to entrepreneurial strategy is to identify the feasible set of choices available to start-ups and …
Continue reading "Another choice: The Intellectual Property Strategy"
The Two Entrepreneurial Paths to Monopoly
It is always interesting when two famous entrepreneurs disagree on something fundamental. In this case, it is Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel. Here is Marc Andreessen's recent tweet. Something my friend & hero Peter Thiel and I vigorously disagree on: I *love* competition, I think it's invigorating/stimulating/productive. — Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) June 30, 2014 //platform.twitter.com/widgets.jsPut …
Continue reading "The Two Entrepreneurial Paths to Monopoly"
Choosing not to disrupt (Embedding in a value chain)
This post is a continuing part of an on-going series on entrepreneurial strategy. The previous posts in the series involved disruptive strategy and are here and here. Recall that the notion of entrepreneurial strategy is based on the foundation that once you have an idea the business model that is matched to commercialise that idea …
Continue reading "Choosing not to disrupt (Embedding in a value chain)"
When does a disruptive strategy work?
Yesterday, I argued that start-ups have a choice as to what strategy or business model they select to pair with their idea. In so doing, I looked at their choice to pursue a disruptive strategy which I defined as (a) competing against established firms in the market (as oppose to cooperating or licensing to them) and (b) …
Choosing to disrupt
The recent debate over 'disruption theory' has focussed on the over-use of the word 'disruption' and also on whether it can be used to predict the fate of incumbents in various industries. Somewhat lost in that discussion is precisely what disruption means for start-ups. There has been a tendency to think that start-ups should have …
WhatsApp to Facebook? Strategic compatibility, that's What
There's nothing like $19 billion dollars to set the cat amongst the pigeons. And what's more for something most people even those tech savvy neither use and, in many cases, haven't heard of. Regular readers will be happy to learn that I have been watching this space for some time due to a long standing …
Continue reading "WhatsApp to Facebook? Strategic compatibility, that's What"
Now for some jaw droppingly bad analysis …
... Matt Yglesias in Slate. Now I should preface that I generally like Yglesias's writings which is why I read them but today something happened. The Wall Street Journal reported today that Snapchat turned down a $3 billion acquisition offer from Facebook. ... I say three cheers to Snapchat! The company's founders and investors may or …
Continue reading "Now for some jaw droppingly bad analysis …"
Digitopoly 